Big Five trait theory Essay

A character, this is a characteristic way in which an individual perceives, feels, believes or acts. We use trait to describe some unity, whether he or she is an introvert, a petty nervous individual, strongly attached to the family and whether they ar actu eithery intelligent. Most psychologists, especially personologists argon inte remnanted in finding what kind of traits that are broad and possibly genetically based, as opposed to those that are peculiar and changes very easily.On the basis of psychoanalysis of record possibleness, the sorry five personality traits are based on five broad dimensions of personality, and this has been discovered through with(predicate) empirical research, and they are categorized as openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism (OCEAN). These are the descriptive model of a persons personality (Barrick, & Mount, 1991).A number of theories do exist which attempts to describe the key traits of human organism and o ne of the roughly common and earliest introduced is the theory that is concerned with the inborn, genetically determined traits known as temperaments introduced by Sigmund Freud by the name of Carl Jung. However, this theory was further developed by Myers and Briggs C (Jungs theory students) and developed a personality test based an Jungs temperament which is now known as the Myers-Briggs Type Inventory (MBTI), which has actually become one of the close to famous personality test of all time (Bagby, Marshall, & Georgiades, 2005).Quite often traits are forgathern as opposites, and the first set of this is demarcation between infolding and extraversion, the first refers to the turn tailency of one preferring the world inside oneself, similar unsureness, distaste for social functions, and love of secretiveness while the latter extraversion is the tendency to see to the outside world and in specific, for ones pleasures. These are individuals who are normally outgoing and enjoy s ocial activities, and they are uncomfortable when they are alone. umteen extraverts people, this makes introverts most times feel a bit put upon.In fact in our received society is very pro-extravert, to the point of seeing introversion as abnormal and funnily seeing shy people to be in need of therapy But some cultures see extraverts as the oddballs (Barrick, & Mount, 1991). But whether one is introvert or extravert, one is either born with or not and remain that way for the rest of his/her bearing. It is in that respectfore up to the task of an introvert to behave more like an extravert or as an extravert learn to behave more like an introvert, although it is not easy to switch between the two.Either, being an introvert or extravert is determined by a single gene, and this is something that is pretty unusual for more physical differences. They are the major issues in personality, development, and mental health, although there is currently no evidence for this (McCrae, & Costa, 1990). Furthermore, there is a contrast between sensing and intuiting people because in sensing, it entails getting all their selective information about life from their senses they therefore tend to be realistic, down-to-earth people, but they often tend to see everything in overly simplistic concrete, black or in white terms.While intuiting people tend to get their information from intuition, they therefore tend to be a little bit out of color with the more solid aspects of reality that is to say they are a little flakey, however, they might see the vast picture behind the details better. Most intuition people are often artistic and sometimes philosophical. And because majority of people are sensing, they normally make intuiters feel rather lonely and unappreciated, and considering that our society tends to be distrustful of dreamers, artists, and intellectuals, evening though other societies may be more appreciating (De Fruyt, McCrae, Szirmak, & Nagy, 2004).Secondly, there is a contrast between thinkers and feelers, for view people most times make their decisions on the basis of thinking, that is to say reasoning, system of logic and step-by-step problem solving and it whole shebang very well for physical problems, although it leaves some desires when dealing with situations that are complex like people. And for feeling people, they make their decisions based on their feelings, and this is a kind of intuition that works very well when dealing with people (McCrae, & Costa, 1990).Logistically, half of people are thinkers while the other half, are feelers however, this proportion differ when looking at gender, because majority of males are thinkers while most women are feelers and this matches with even the old stereotypes and the recent research however, there is no any good reason to value thinking over feeling since each has its strengths and weaknesses.The controversy between judging and perceiving judging people in most times according to Freuds anal retentive types are neat, orderly, hardworking, always on time, and schedules things very carefully, and an specimen is a college professor, but perceiving people are more spontaneous for they prefer to do things as the purport dictates them, they are perhaps more fun than judging but they tend not to get things make an example is college students (De Fruyt, McCrae, Szirmak, & Nagy, 2004).However in all the above discussions, it is also important at this point to look at neuroticism, where people tend to be very nervous, emotional sort of people. Although it does not necessary mean one is neurotic, it actually performer that one is more potential to develop, problems that are associated with neuroticism such as phobias, obsessions, and compulsions, in fact these days low neuroticism is often known as emotional stability.And in relation to neuroticism is Psychoticism, and as the name itself suggests these are people with tendencies to psychosis, that is to say that they are more likely to have problems dealing with reality. Most often psychotic people have hallucinations and delusions like odd beliefs like these of being watered, perhaps by the CIA, or even by creatures on earth and other planets. Secondly, afterward extraversion-introversion, is emotional stability, and these are people who are not nervous and they are not emotional in short it is an opposite of the neuroticism.They feignt experience negative feelings like anxiety, anger or depression, although they are more likely to experience, one or tow of the emotions. These people are emotionally uncreative that is to say, they dont respond emotionally to events that affect them and their reactions to most events are quite very normal. They are not more likely to interpret ordinary situations as threatening and also minor frustrations as dispiritedly difficult.In addition, negative emotional reactions tend to persist for usually short periods of time, this means, they are often in a good mood. These problems in emotional regulations for these people diminish because of their ability to think clearly, decision making, and contend effectively with stress. In general these people tend to be calm, emotionally stable, and they are free from refractory of negative feelings (Barrick, & Mount, 1991). However, all the above five factors, and the latter two so far discussed show an model from both hereditary and environment.During childhood and adolescent stages, a persons ratings on these factor traits may change, with average levels of agreeableness and conscientiousness which typically increases while Extraversion neuroticism and openness decreases. But for most people after attaining 30 years stability rather than change becomes the general rule, there is unparalleled stability during adulthood. But this does not mean that personality cannot change, given the altering circumstances in life or any efforts to do so, it actually means after attaining 30 all people more often than not do not change their personality very much.As regards to men and women they show remarkable differences in the above across cultures, women show good response to agreeableness and neuroticism domains, all the same, there is confidence trick gender differences in personality (McGhee, Ehrler, & Buckhalt, 2007). Conclusion This leaves the area of investigation to make a model of personality, because the big five personality traits are only empirical observations and not a theory it therefore means that the observations of personality research still remains to be explained.And last but not least, is the downwards cite of the big five theory or the five factor model into childhood, because this will provide childrens social and emotional adjustments and also in academic achievement as they grow. This is because there are implications that, the expression of personality traits might be more differentiated in childhood than in adulthood (McGhee, Ehrler, & Buckhalt, 2007). Refer ences